Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
MediaWiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
What Everyone Should Find Out About Berita Dunia
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
<br>Title: <br>An Article Writing Philosophy Do You Have One<br><br><br><br>Word Count:<br>575<br><br>[https://avtoglushak.com/ avtoglushak.com]<br><br>Summary:<br>Do you have a well thought out reason for writing articles? That is most likely your article writing philosophy, but in case you dont have one, let me make a few suggestions for developing one.<br><br><br><br><br>Keywords:<br>articles,writing,motivation,inspiration,politics,op-eds,inspirational,political writing,writing tips<br><br><br><br><br>Article Body:<br>Thousands of articles about writing articles are bouncing all over the internet and the printed media at any given time. Most of these articles are tips and advice, invetaris a few are about grammar and clarity and yet others are about subject matter and how to find it. A philosophy for writing articles is none of the above.<br><br><br><br>Simply put an article writing philosophy is not about how you write but why. Although it is acceptable to write articles for publicity or hits to your website it is not the strongest motive. Then there are those who write by researching the most sought after keywords on the net and write articles that lead people to those words, thus to their sites. This also qualifies as a reason to write but only in the most strained sense of the word.<br><br><br><br>Writers are somewhat like preachers, they have a soap box called the printed page and they have a message just like the minister, even if the subject matter is not homiletically inclined. As a young preacher I overheard someone say that young preachers just have to say something, but older preachers may actually have something to say. The first step in developing a writing philosophy is to ask your self this question do I have something to say?<br><br><br><br>Professional people can quickly answer yes to the question of whether they have something to say. Years of study, training and experience put them ahead of others and all they may lack is just a bit of priming to know how to convey their knowledge by the written word. For those who are not professionals the next question should be how do you see. In the event you loved this informative article and also you want to be given more details about komersial ([https://albufeirauncovered.com https://albufeirauncovered.com]) i implore you to go to our web-site. Some people are naturally endowed with a good eye. They dont need to be politicians to have a good grasp of politics. They can predict, criticize, evaluate and comment on the whole sphere with great clarity and in some cases may affect the outcome of politics in some way. They weigh in so to speak on the subject. In case you think that isnt so check out the vast opportunities for op-eds (opinion editorials) on the internet today. Thousands of political right and left wing sites are looking for invetaris people with good political vision. In this of the people society John Q Public is still sought for his view of political figures and things done in the political theatre.<br><br><br><br>Having a good minds eye applies to any field of interest whatsoever. Technicians put together complex electronic and telemetering devices in spacecraft but some people are weighing the result of all that space hardware on people, the environment or the future of man and their insight may be just as needed as the tiniest circuit board any techie can produce.<br><br><br><br>The motivation for writing an article may only be to provide information; at other times it may be to provide inspiration. Even anger could qualify as a good motive if you are particularly incensed over some injustice or bad behavior. It may sound all to rudimentary or perhaps old fashioned to say that if you are seeking a higher good to be done through your writing then you will always succeed. Sound corny? Think again. No one will ever reject an article that attempts to right a wrong, lift people up or provide a little light and comfort in a troubled world. If that is your motive then that is your philosophy. Good writing.<br><br>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to MediaWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
MediaWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)